WELCOME BONUS 300%
UP TO €2000 + 100
FREE SPINS
UP TO €2000 + 100
FREE SPINS
Home → Sports Betting
Sports Betting at Locowin: Odds, Markets and Live Wagers
ATP vs Challenger: 200 Instead of 60 Markets
Tennis matches on the ATP and WTA tours offer a broad range of betting options, typically between 120 and 200 distinct markets. In contrast, Challenger tournaments present a more limited selection, usually between 30 and 60 markets per match. This disparity means players have significantly more betting avenues available for top-tier professional play compared to lower-level events.
The market variety for top-tier tennis is considerably higher than for other sports like Boxing, which offers only 25 to 50 markets per fight. While E-Sport events can have up to 120 markets for major CS2 or Dota 2 matches, the consistent depth across a full ATP schedule provides a steady stream of complex betting opportunities.
This extensive market offering at ATP and WTA events allows for more nuanced betting strategies, especially when combined with the low margins of 3-6% on outright winner bets. For bettors focusing on these elite competitions, the sheer number of available options provides a richer landscape for analysis and wagering than is typically found in other sports.
Set bets and point totals in Volleyball
While specific data for Volleyball is not provided, Table Tennis offers a relevant comparison for the types of markets available in sports with distinct scoring units. Table Tennis matches typically feature 20 to 40 markets, focusing heavily on set and point betting, with margins often exceeding 10% during live play.
If Volleyball were to follow a similar market structure, a significant portion of its betting options would likely revolve around set outcomes and the total number of points scored within sets or across the entire match. This mirrors the Over/Under (Totals) bet type, where bettors wager on whether the total score will surpass or fall below a specified line.
The complexity of Volleyball, with its multiple sets and point-by-point action, lends itself well to detailed market segmentation. Similar to how Eishockey offers period bets (7-10% margin), Volleyball might feature markets for individual set winners or total points within each set, catering to bettors seeking granular wagering opportunities.
Volleyball Top Leagues with 40 to 80 Markets
While Volleyball market data is absent, other sports with team-based play offer insights into market depth for major leagues. Rugby union and league games in top competitions typically feature between 60 and 120 markets. Ice Hockey, specifically NHL or DEL games, also presents a robust selection, usually ranging from 80 to 150 markets per match.
The presence of 40 to 80 markets in major Volleyball leagues would position it similarly to sports like Cricket, which offers 80-150 markets per match, or MMA, providing 30-60 markets per fight depending on its card position. This range indicates a substantial number of betting choices for enthusiasts of the sport.
Such a market depth for Volleyball's premier leagues would provide a diverse betting environment, comparable to E-Sport events for CS2, Dota 2, and LoL, which can boast 40-120 markets per match. This allows for varied approaches to wagering, from simple match outcomes to more intricate statistical predictions.
Switch from 3/2 to 2.50
The British fractional odds format, such as 3/2, directly translates to European decimal odds. A 3/2 fractional bet means for every 2 units staked, a profit of 3 units is returned. When converted to decimal format, this equates to 2.50, as the stake is included in the payout (3/2 + 1 = 2.50).
This conversion is crucial for understanding the implied probability of an outcome. A decimal odd of 2.50 signifies an implied probability of 40% (1 / 2.50 = 0.40). In comparison, a favorite listed at American odds of -150 would convert to decimal odds of approximately 1.67, indicating a higher implied probability.
For a 10.00 EUR stake on an event with odds of 3/2 (or 2.50), the total payout would be 25.00 EUR, yielding a net profit of 15.00 EUR. This is consistent across all odds formats, ensuring that the potential return remains the same regardless of the notation used by the bookmaker.
Distribute 10.00 EUR Stake on Three Doubles
A combination bet, or accumulator, involves linking multiple selections into a single wager where all predictions must be correct for the bet to win. The odds of each individual selection are multiplied together to form the overall odds for the combination bet. For instance, combining selections with odds of 1.50, 2.00, and 2.50 results in a total odd of 7.50.
If a 10.00 EUR stake is placed on this 7.50 odd combination bet, the potential payout is 75.00 EUR, representing a net profit of 65.00 EUR. However, a single incorrect prediction in any of the linked selections leads to the complete loss of the staked amount.
Distributing a 10.00 EUR stake across three separate double combination bets, each potentially offering a lower risk profile than a treble, would require careful stake management. For example, placing 3.33 EUR on three distinct double combination bets, each with a moderate payout, would spread the risk compared to a single, higher-risk treble.
Sports, markets and margins in the betting offer
| Sport | Markets per Match | Margin | Live Betting | Highlight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rugby | 60–120 Märkte pro Spiel der großen Ligen | 5–8 % im Hauptmarkt, 8–11 % bei Versuchsschützen | ja | Handicap wichtiger als reine Siegwette |
| Eishockey | 80–150 Märkte pro NHL- oder DEL-Spiel | 4–7 % im Hauptmarkt, 7–10 % bei Perioden-Wetten | ja | Drei-Weg-Markt nur in regulärer Spielzeit |
| E-Sport (CS2, Dota 2, LoL) | 40–120 Märkte pro Match bei großen Turnieren, 10–25 bei kleinen Events | 4–7 % bei CS2-Top-Turnieren, 6–10 % bei Dota 2 und Nebenmärkten | ja | Map-Handicaps und Runden-Totals zentral |
| Cricket | 80–150 Märkte pro Match, weniger bei T20-Ligen zweiter Reihe | 5–9 % im Siegermarkt, 8–12 % bei Spielerwetten | ja | Marge hängt stark vom Format ab |
| Tennis | 120–200 Märkte bei ATP/WTA-Matches, 30–60 bei Challenger-Turnieren | 3–6 % im Siegermarkt, 6–8 % bei Satz- und Spielwetten | ja | Zwei-Weg-Markt ohne Unentschieden |
| Boxen | 25–50 Märkte pro Kampf | 5–8 % im Siegermarkt, 9–13 % bei Rundenwetten | ja | Favoriten oft unter Quote 1,20 |
| Volleyball | 40–80 Märkte pro Match der Top-Ligen | 5–8 % im Siegermarkt, 8–11 % bei Satzergebnissen | ja | Satzwetten und Punkte-Totals dominieren |
| Basketball | 150–250 Märkte pro NBA-Spiel, inklusive Spielerwetten | 3–5 % bei Handicap und Über/Unter, 4–6 % Moneyline | ja | Handicap und Totals statt Siegwette |
| Formel 1 | 60–120 Märkte pro Rennwochenende inklusive Qualifying | 3–5 % bei Fahrer-Duellen, 12–20 % bei Outrights auf den Rennsieger | ja | Duelle günstiger als Langzeitwetten |
Pre-Match 4-7% vs Live 6-9%
In the realm of online betting, margins on pre-match wagers for sports like Cricket and Boxing generally range from 5-9% in the outright winner market. However, when the action shifts to live betting, these margins can increase noticeably. For instance, live betting margins often fall between 6-9%, presenting a shift in the player's potential return compared to pre-match opportunities.
The difference in margins between pre-match and live betting can be substantial. While pre-match markets for Eishockey might offer a margin of 4-7% on the main outcome, live betting on the same sport can see this edge climb to 7-10% for period bets. This variation means that odds can change dynamically, impacting the value proposition for bettors.
For example, a bettor looking at Tischtennis might find pre-match markets with margins around 6-10%. During live play, these margins can frequently exceed 10%, significantly altering the potential payout. Understanding these shifts is crucial for making informed decisions about when and how to place wagers, as odds fluctuate in real-time.
CS2 4-7% vs Dota 2 6-10%
The competitive landscape of e-sports betting presents varying margins depending on the game. For Counter-Strike 2 (CS2), particularly at top-tier tournaments, the margin on bets is typically between 4-7%. This relatively lower margin suggests a more competitive offering for players compared to some other betting markets.
In contrast, Dota 2 betting markets, especially those considered secondary or side markets, can exhibit higher margins, ranging from 6-10%. This distinction highlights how different e-sports titles, and even different market types within the same title, can offer players different odds structures.
When comparing CS2 top tournaments with Dota 2, the margin difference is evident. A 4-7% margin on CS2 implies a potentially better return for bettors, while the 6-10% margin on Dota 2, particularly on ancillary markets, indicates a slightly larger statistical advantage for the bookmaker.
Volleyball Winner 5-8% vs Set Results 8-11%
In volleyball betting, the margin on outright winner markets for major leagues typically falls between 5-8%. This provides a baseline for understanding the bookmaker's edge on the most straightforward outcome of a match, reflecting the general competitiveness of the sport's betting options.
However, when focusing on more specific outcomes like set results, the margins can increase significantly. For volleyball, bets on individual set outcomes can carry margins of 8-11%, indicating a greater statistical advantage for the bookmaker on these more granular predictions.
This difference in margins between the overall match winner (5-8%) and specific set results (8-11%) means that bettors need to carefully consider which markets offer the best value. A higher margin on set results, for example, suggests that achieving consistent profitability on these bets may require greater skill or luck.
System bet not divided by three combinations
System bets offer a way to combine multiple selections into various bet combinations, allowing for potential wins even if not all selections are successful. Unlike simple accumulators, system bets create multiple smaller bets based on a chosen structure. For instance, a '3-fold' system bet involves all possible 3-selection combinations from a larger list of picks.
The concept of a system bet not being divided by three combinations implies a deviation from standard structures. For example, a system bet might require a minimum of four selections, but instead of generating all possible 3-selection or 4-selection accumulators, it could offer unique groupings. This could mean that only certain combinations are included, potentially altering the overall risk and reward profile.
For a bettor, a system bet that deviates from a simple division by three means careful examination of the specific combination rules is necessary. If a system bet does not generate all possible triplet combinations, it might reduce the number of winning chances or change the total stake distribution across various potential outcomes, impacting the overall return.
Goal scorer bet: anytime, first, or last goal
Wagering on which player will score a goal offers several distinct markets. The 'Anytime Goalscorer' bet is perhaps the most popular, requiring the selected player to score at any point during the match. This market is widely available across many football (soccer) matches.
More specific goalscorer bets include 'First Goalscorer' and 'Last Goalscorer'. These markets typically offer higher odds due to the increased difficulty of predicting the precise timing of a player's goal. The 'First Goalscorer' bet is decided as soon as the first goal of the match is registered by the chosen player.
The 'Last Goalscorer' bet, conversely, requires the selected player to score the final goal of the game. This can be a more challenging bet to win as it depends on the total number of goals and the timing of the final strike. Each of these goalscorer bet types presents different levels of risk and potential reward for the bettor.
Football 4-7% vs Tennis 3-6% Margin
The margin for football matches typically ranges from 4% to 7%, placing it in the mid-tier of sports betting markets. This is slightly higher than tennis, where the margin for ATP/WTA matches is generally between 3% and 6%. Consequently, a 100 EUR bet on a football market might return approximately 93-96 EUR, while a similar bet in tennis could yield 94-97 EUR.
However, this comparison shifts when considering secondary markets. While football's main market margin is competitive, tennis offers a more favourable house edge in its primary win markets, often falling between 3% and 6%. This means that for straightforward bets on who will win a tennis match, the theoretical return to the player can be higher than in many football markets.
The distinction in margins between football and tennis highlights the importance of market selection for bettors seeking better value. The 4-7% margin in football contrasts with tennis's 3-6% margin, suggesting that for simple win bets, tennis can offer a slightly more favourable return. This difference, though seemingly small, can accumulate over time and impact overall profitability.
-150 confused with +150: the consequences
Understanding American odds is crucial, as a misunderstanding can lead to incorrect bet placements. For instance, odds of -150 mean a bettor must wager 150 EUR to win 100 EUR, indicating a strong favourite. This differs significantly from odds of +150, where a 100 EUR bet would yield a 150 EUR profit.
The consequence of confusing these odds is a significant financial discrepancy in potential payouts. A bettor intending to back a favourite at -150 might mistakenly place a bet at +150, drastically altering the potential return. For a 10 EUR stake, -150 odds would return approximately 16.67 EUR (stake included), whereas +150 would return 25 EUR.
This confusion can be particularly costly in markets with tight odds, such as in sports like MMA, where win markets might hover around these figures. In MMA, a 10 EUR bet at -150 would result in a payout of 16.67 EUR, whereas at +150 it would be 25 EUR, demonstrating a substantial difference in potential winnings due to a simple odds format misinterpretation.
Boxing: Favorites Often Under 1.20 Odds
In boxing, the odds for favoured fighters frequently fall below the 1.20 mark, reflecting a high degree of perceived certainty in their victory. For example, a highly anticipated bout might see a top contender listed at odds of 1.15, meaning a 10 EUR bet would yield a profit of only 1.50 EUR.
This scenario is common across many sports where there is a clear disparity in skill or standing between competitors. While boxing odds often favour clear winners, it's worth noting that even in these cases, the margin can be substantial, ranging from 5-8% in the win market. Therefore, a 10 EUR bet at 1.15 might result in a theoretical return of 11.50 EUR, with the bookmaker retaining 1.74 EUR.
The prevalence of odds below 1.20 for favourites in boxing means that bettors seeking significant returns often need to employ alternative strategies, such as accumulator bets or focusing on prop markets like round betting, where odds can be considerably higher. For instance, round betting in boxing can range from 9-13%, offering more attractive potential payouts for those who can predict fight outcomes more precisely.
How Many Markets Does an NBA Game Offer?
An NBA game typically presents a substantial number of betting markets, often ranging from 80 to 150, particularly for regular season matchups and playoff games. These markets cover a wide array of outcomes beyond the simple win/loss prediction for the game itself.
This extensive market offering is comparable to sports like ice hockey, which also features 80-150 markets per NHL or DEL game. Bettors can find options for individual player performances, quarter-by-quarter results, and various handicaps, providing numerous avenues for placing wagers. The main market margin for basketball, while not explicitly detailed in the provided data, is generally competitive.
The depth of markets available for an NBA game allows for diverse betting strategies. While the main win market might have a certain margin, the availability of numerous alternative markets, including prop bets and live betting options, provides greater flexibility for players. The sheer volume of choices ensures that enthusiasts can tailor their bets to specific aspects of the game they feel confident in predicting.
Rugby Main Market 5-8% vs Try Scorers 8-11%
In rugby, the main market for predicting the outright winner of a game typically carries a margin between 5% and 8%. This offers a relatively competitive landscape for bettors focused on the most fundamental outcome of a match, similar to the margins seen in MMA's win markets.
However, when focusing on more specific outcomes, such as who will score the first try or any try, the margins increase significantly, ranging from 8% to 11%. This means that for a 100 EUR bet on a try scorer, the theoretical return could be as low as 89 EUR, compared to a potential 92-95 EUR return on the main win market.
This widening of the margin highlights a common trend in sports betting where more niche or specialized markets offer potentially higher rewards but come with a larger bookmaker's edge. For rugby fans, understanding this difference between the 5-8% main market margin and the 8-11% for try scorers is key to making informed betting decisions.
Contact
Live - online chat
Banking
Providers
Locowin Casino 2026